Search for: "Doe 5" Results 8941 - 8960 of 86,244
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2016, 8:40 am by Kathy Darvil
Just because you don’t see a librarian sitting at the reference desk, does not mean we are not there to help. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:53 pm by LawDiva
Your Success is Our Success 5. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:39 am by Walter Olson
No thanks (2) U.K.: Great moments in international human rights (5) U.K.: Europe court says prisoners have right to use artificial insemination (2) Shot in Kosovo, collects £2.4m from British defense ministry (1) September 20 roundup (8) [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 12:25 am
Just 5 days later comes the second Presidential debate on October 7. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:52 am by David Oxenford
  One important caveat to that advice is that LUC does apply to any elections that are held based on outcomes that were not determinative on Tuesday’s Election Day. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 8:40 am by Alan Ackerman
This does not seem true for North Carolina, foreboding and a likely unfavorable result for the Joyce Development Corp. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
As explained above under point [5], the proceedings can evolve in different directions.[7] This conclusion is supported by the practice described in the impugned decision. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 7:05 am by Tia Fenton
  See our January 9, 2010 and March 5, 2010 posts for more details on the Commission’s final determination in this investigation. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 8:13 pm
  It's long been rumored, now the department's inspector general and office of professional responsibility have made their report:We found that all 7 applicants [in 2002] who indicated that they were American Constitution Society members were deselected by the Screening Committee for interviews, while 2 of the 29 applicants who indicated that they were members of the Federalist Society were deselected[snip]The proportion of Democratic Party affiliated applicants deselected by the… [read post]
13 May 2013, 9:38 am by Gene Quinn
The systems claims were split 5 to 5 and so remain unpatentable because that is what the district court ruled. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:48 am by Joy Waltemath
In the Sixth Circuit, the “written agreement” required by Section 302(c)(5)(B) does not have to be a CBA as long as the written agreement “sets out the employer’s obligation to contribute” to the benefit funds. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:13 pm by Adam Levitin
  But it does refer the reader back to the Important Definitions section. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 6:17 am by tjsllibrary
California Supreme Court Oral Arguments: Proposition 8 Same-Sex Marriage March 5, 2009. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 10:04 pm
Dec. 5, 2006):This appeal primarily concerns the issue, surprisingly unsettled in this Circuit, as to what standards govern a district judge in adjudicating a motion for class certification under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. . . . [read post]