Search for: "J. C." Results 8941 - 8960 of 19,483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2014, 6:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
April 29, 2014 Van Antwerpen, J.), revisited the issue of whether or not a federal court could reject an insurance company's effort to bring a declaratory judgment action against an insured on an issue of coverage in the federal courts of Pennsylvania. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:22 pm by Douglas
Afinal, pergunta-se: “A” praticou o crime descrito no artigo 154-A do Código Penal? [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:22 am by WSLL
Rossetti, Deputy Attorney General; Michael J. [read post]
14 May 2014, 7:40 am by Lucie Olejnikova
Lucie OlejnikovaTeam Members: Ann Bermont, Bianca Francois, Rocky Boussias, Kiersten Schramek Willem C. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
C'est pourquoi elle n'a rien à redire contre la pratique constante de l'OEB, qui consiste à faire objection aux modifications de demandes divisionnaires et à les rejeter lorsque la demande divisionnaire modifiée revendique le même objet qu'une demande antérieure encore en instance ou qu'un brevet délivré sur la base d'une demande antérieure. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:33 pm by Douglas
Vez por outra acabava até em empurrões, uns socos para lá outros para cá. [read post]
13 May 2014, 6:35 pm
Subsection (c) provides that "[f]or purposes of this Part, conduct is frivolous if (2) it is undertaken primarily to delay or prolong the resolution of the litigation, or to harass or maliciously injure another; or (3) it asserts material factual statements that are false". [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
Here Arnold J stated that proceedings requesting a DNI in relation to both a UK and foreign designations of a European patent could be brought before English courts also considering that the plaintiffs undertook not to challenge validity of the patent at issue.According to the Court of Genoa, Italian (and more at large: European) courts may hear DNI claims only when the issue of validity of the patent is not raised by way of an action or as a defence. [read post]
12 May 2014, 6:59 pm
 Next up was César J Ramírez-Montes (University of Leeds, England), whose staunchly and articulately defended paper "Sixth Time Lucky: Starbucks and the Lessons from European Law" generated a good deal of heat as well as light, resulting in the paper's two moderators duelling over a number of issues of EU trade mark law. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Michael GeistAppointment of New Copyright Board of Canada Chair Offers Chance for Change Copyright Board of Canada chair William J. [read post]