Search for: "M. B.1."
Results 8941 - 8960
of 13,699
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2023, 6:19 am
However, civil penalties are available pursuant to Section 5(m)(1)(B) of the FTC Act, if the FTC proves that a company engages in certain practices that it knows are unfair or deceptive as determined by a final cease and desist order issued in a contested action. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
Toutefois, lorsque des travaux devant être votés à la majorité de l’article 25, bien que non adoptés selon cette majorité, ont été accueillis favorablement par le tiers des voix de tous les copropriétaires composant le syndicat, l’article 25-1 prévoit que la même assemblée peut décider à la majorité prévue à l’article 24 –… [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 10:04 pm
DUI attorney Charles M. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:32 am
I'm sorry, but I just don't buy any of it. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:48 am
This is part 1 of 2, the first five: The kids get to choose who they live with as soon as they are 12 (or 14, or whatever). [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:02 am
Es el caso de la sentencia de la Sala tercera de 30 de noviembre de 2021 (rec.4464/2020) que al hilo de abordar una cuestión de apariencia anodina deja claras reglas básicas. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 7:57 am
Because it was (a) only one (b) household employee, I’m not sure it’s truly “disqualifying. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:18 am
Nov. 27, 1883 Honorable John M. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 8:55 am
” For violations of UDAP rules issued under Section 18 of the FTC Act, the FTC can file actions in federal district court seeking either consumer redress under Section 19 or civil penalties under Section 5(m)(1)(A) of the FTC Act. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
The complete Issue 52:1 can be downloaded here. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:26 am
We will have an answer to you in 24 hours.1. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:34 am
Circuit Judge Thomas B. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 3:00 am
1. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 10:20 am
Cooley, 1 F.3d 985, 993 (10th Cir.1993)). [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:11 am
That's been dropped from the current proposal but it's arguably the most important part because a) it helps resolve the backlog of noncompliant drivers and b) would actually generate revenue from people who aren't paying.With 1.2 million drivers noncompliant, if 1/3 of them took advantage of an amnesty program and paid an average of $250 each to get their driver's license back, that would generate $100 million in additional revenue (400,000 x $250) from drivers… [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 4:03 pm
El precio es de 1500 euros más IVA y con posibilidad de estar subvencionado. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 2:01 pm
I’m not wholly sure that this actually amends form 6A, rather than stating how form 6A is to be read. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
This week the randomly selected blogs are 1. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:02 am
"There was a Fourth Amendment issue on question 1? [read post]
13 May 2018, 3:06 pm
The journal’s “Editor of Record,” Steven B. [read post]
