Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 8961 - 8980 of 42,246
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2020, 6:12 pm by Jamie Markham
Unlike Williams, the State did not volunteer reasons before the trial court ruled on step one; the State was ordered to give reasons after the court ruled. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 1:40 pm by Eric Caligiuri
And, this is in contrast to the usual rule that a satisfactory monetary award cautions again a finding of irreparable injury. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 10:27 pm by Scott McKeown
  Section 311 provides rules for filing a petition and § 316 guides trial conduct. [read post]
  If so, then the employer must show by a preponderance of the evidence that it would have taken the same adverse action regardless of the employee’s protected conduct. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 1:36 pm by Joseph Longley
Last year, the First Circuit affirmed a ruling in the District of Maine under the ADA that a jail could not deny a woman serving a 40-day sentence access to the MAT prescribed to her by a doctor. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:00 am by ernst
This Article adds previously overlooked but critical historical evidence of constitutional debates leading up to these delegations, as well as the significant policies that the executive branch determined in Congress’s stead. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Federal Rule of Evidence 602 requires a witness to have personal knowledge of a matter, and Allahyari could not know what Green intended when serving the initial disclosures. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:48 am by Thomas Surmanski
  It is not intended that the provincial court judge strictly apply the rules of evidence. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:15 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
This distinction, however, mattered little in this case, as plaintiff asserted that she had presented sufficient evidence to survive a directed verdict on either an ordinary negligence or a premises liability claim, and the Court of Appeals agreed. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although a later-in-time statute supersedes a treaty as a matter of U.S. domestic law, the statute can put the U.S. in breach as a matter of international law. [read post]
” Advice also found that an employer’s comment in its position statement to the Region that “discussing work matters with non-employees (even previous employees) is not acceptable in any work environment” is not an unlawful blanket prohibition of Section 7 activity because (i) there was no evidence the employer communicated this statement to the charging party, and (ii) even if it did, such a statement—standing alone—would not constitute a… [read post]