Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 8961 - 8980
of 16,996
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2014, 10:46 am
[1] People of the State of California v. [read post]
Evidence from micro-level patent application data or gobbledygook from the depths of legal academia?
18 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm
How long did it take for people to discover the value of inventions of Chester Carlson or Reginald Fessenden? [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:57 am
To that end the EU legislature limited itself to stating the nature, conditions for grant and effects of unitary protection, covering only the phase subsequent to the grant of the European patent. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 10:04 am
Koch v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
Haringey decided against pursuing the grant because the conditions were such that it would still suffer a significant shortfall in funding. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
People v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 1:59 pm
The case of People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 3:18 pm
” The motion noted that the Supreme Court had granted review of the King case last Friday, and that “a decision is expected this Term. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 1:04 pm
Armer and People v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 12:02 pm
The petition relies on the 1980′s decision in Harper and Row v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:59 am
"Here" = King v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
” Brockman offered Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:41 am
In other words, granting the unions’ motions in the wake of the November 2013 mayoral election would essentially condone a collateral attack on the democratic process and could erode the legitimacy of decisions made by the democratically‐elected representatives of the people. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 9:55 pm
(See Luzano v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
Tuesday afternoon I had the pleasure of debating/discussing King v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
New Judgment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
12 Nov 2014, 3:08 am
Local housing authorities have statutory obligations under the Housing Act 1996, Pt VII to provide assistance to people who are homeless in certain circumstances. [read post]
