Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 8961 - 8980
of 21,158
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
As American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
This was set forth in the landmark 1984 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Universal v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 6:18 am
State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:27 am
In its 2013 decision in Capitol Records v ReDigi [noted here and here] the US District Court for the Southern District of New York held that the first sale defence (the EU doctrine of exhaustion was derived from US first sale doctrine) is limited to material items. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 9:07 am
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 12:43 pm
By Daniel RichardsonMcGoff v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 11:05 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Jonnie Napier v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:35 am
The attempted sale took place at the 40th annual New York International Numismatic Convention.A past New York prosecution involving cultural artifacts is the famous case of U.S. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:05 pm
Yesterday's dismissal of an Apple v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 9:24 am
Additional Resources: Hamid v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 5:57 am
Homeowners appealed to the state’s Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:34 pm
The Real Property Transfer Tax Ordinance does not define “realty sold,” but states that the scope of “realty” is determined by the definition or scope of the term under state law. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 5:57 am
Homeowners appealed to the state’s Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 6:25 am
Synygy, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:00 am
Lastly, Kaspersky claims that it has standing to assert Fifth Amendment due process rights because it has “substantial connections” to the United States based on its employment of 300 people in Massachusetts and its sales to customers and thus, comes under the framework announced in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:12 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit tackled self-execution of 1958 Convention Article 6—curtailing jurisdiction over foreign vessels in international waters—in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:19 am
Specifically, SLUSA prohibits state-based suites alleging fraud "in connection with the purchase or sale" of covered securities. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:22 am
Specifically, SLUSA prohibits state-based suites alleging fraud "in connection with the purchase or sale" of covered securities. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 6:54 am
Jones & Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
The new one-two held the generic drug claims preempted while at the same time ruling that the state in question (see our 50-state compilation) did not recognize inadequate warning claims against companies that neither sold nor profited from the sale of the drug that purportedly injured the plaintiff. [read post]
