Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 8961 - 8980
of 9,600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2008, 2:11 pm
On September 26, 2008, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania decided Hansen v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 11:47 pm
They are easy to state, but often difficult to apply. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 2:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2008, 11:48 am
Shah v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 10:19 am
Gourdine v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 7:31 pm
See Farina v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 10:16 pm
Alexander In a conviction for sale of controlled substance in or near school grounds, denial of writ of habeas corpus is affirmed over claims that the state courts unreasonably applied Batson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:40 am
The 2007 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:39 pm
He's picked the state that can pull it off. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 9:41 pm
For example: The employer cannot avoid looking at alternate positions merely because a doctor's note states that the employee is "unable to work. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 9:41 pm
For example: The employer cannot avoid looking at alternate positions merely because a doctor's note states that the employee is "unable to work. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 4:21 pm
White The First Appellate District's recent decision of Nadaf-Rahrov v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 1:15 am
The First Department has issued their decision in Kremen v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 5:50 am
Doctors were. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 4:04 am
In Krenzke v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 8:12 pm
See Gourdine v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:59 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 9:13 am
Leanyear v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Srivastava, No. 074386 Order suppressing evidence seized by federal officers from residence and medical offices of doctor-plaintiff is vacated and remanded where: 1) the evidence suppressed was constitutionally seized and within the scope of the search warrants; and 2) the court's blanket suppression of all seized evidence was erroneous. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 1:46 pm
Case Name: In re Palmer v. [read post]