Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of"
Results 8961 - 8980
of 13,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2014, 6:30 am
medsearch7@optonline.net ©2014 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:10 pm
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 68 Cal. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:21 am
How do you think this appeal came out? [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 5:36 am
United States, 265 F.3d 1371, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
The Review Board drew on the test set out in Star Athletica LLC v Varsity Brands Inc (137 S. [read post]
23 Jun 2018, 7:30 am
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to revisit his decision, and it filed a Ninth Circuit appeal with the Federal Circuit. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:37 am
Friedman Supply Co., Inc., 416 N.J. [read post]
TTAB Finds KOTA JAPAN Primarily Geographically Deceptively Misdescriptive for Knife Sharpening Tools
18 Jun 2020, 3:22 am
Innovations, Inc., 66 USPQ2d at 1856].As to the first question, there was no evidence of record that KOTA has any meaning. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
For example, Article 33.4(c) of the Administrative Services Unit’s collective bargaining agreement between the State and the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., for the period 2011-2016 provides: “Unless both parties agree, the proceedings in disciplinary arbitrations should not be tape recorded. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 3:08 am
Free Trade Ass’n, 43 USPQ2d at 1285-86 (finding that the “NAFTA is an institution, in the same way that the United Nations is an institution…”). [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:04 pm
” The owner of this patent, SecurityPoint Holdings, Inc., has sued the United States government for infringement. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:08 am
The case, titled Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:39 am
Prior to attending law school at Nova in 2008, Jerry was an accountant for National Retail Properties, Inc. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:00 pm
Peugeot Motors of Am., Inc., 768 F.2d1159, 1165 (10th Cir. 1985)). [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:49 am
On this appeal, applicant argued that LUCKENBACH has a non-surname meaning because consumers recognize it as applicant's trademark. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:14 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 4:58 am
Southeast Personnel Leasing Inc. [read post]
