Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 8961 - 8980 of 23,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2007, 10:50 am
"`Forthwith' subpoenas should be used only when an immediate response is justified and then only with the prior approval of the United States Attorney. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:21 am by Amy Howe
For Lee, who had come to the United States nearly 30 years before, this was a penalty worse than prison: He owned two restaurants in the United States and was the sole caregiver for his elderly parents; by contrast, he no longer had any ties to South Korea, where he was born. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 1:34 pm by Aurora Barnes
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:53 am by Sarah Cleveland
  And contrary to some commentators, the 1790 criminal piracy statute at issue in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 6:00 am by Barry Sookman
Justice Manson had suggested that the doctrine was not applicable in Canada, stating: Some United States Courts have held such use can cause “initial interest confusion”, where confusion is caused in the customer before actually purchasing a good or service, when the customer seeks a particular brand of goods or services, but is drawn or enticed to a competitor’s goods or services through the competitor’s use of the first company’s trade name… [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 3:22 am
Wehrman identified herself by her own name and as "an individual citizen of [the] United States," with no reference to WDI. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Isabel McArdle
v)              Is the Secretary of State entitled to rely on the defence of act of state? [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 3:30 am by Christopher J. Robinette
Instead, Lahav insists that the doctrinal rule for producers of injurious products in the United States in the nineteenth century was negligence liability. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 12:24 pm
The territorial limitation contained in the policy provided coverage for incidents occurring in Canada, the United States of America, and any other jurisdiction designated in the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule. [read post]
  United States District Courts in California oversee some of the largest caseloads in the country.[1] Understandably reluctant to see their dockets expand, these courts often look for grounds to remand cases to state court. [read post]