Search for: "Brown v. Thomas" Results 881 - 900 of 1,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell and former Clinton Attorney General Eric Holder had a preposterous discussion of how if Roe goes down, Brown v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 8:07 am by Orin Kerr
Circuit did not reach a majority view on the issue, although five of its 11 judges, Judges Harry Edwards, Judith Rogers, David Tatel, Janice Brown and Thomas Griffith, argued that identification searches were not permitted. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 10:23 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the March 18 and March 25 conferences) Brown v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Next Week in the Courts On Monday 6 December 2010, Mr Justice Tugendhat will hear an application in the case of Etherington v Associated Newspapers Ltd [Update 2] On Thursday 9 December 2010, the Court of Appeal will hand down judgment in the case of Clift v Slough BC (on appeal from [2009] EWHC 1550 (QB)) Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and… [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
  There is a also a piece on the reforms by Maggie Brown. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Dawn Johnsen
The insightful concluding sentence of Michael Dorf’s post provides an excellent starting point: “The only real question in this case is the one that Charles Black saw at issue in Brown v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:53 am by Aaron L. Nielson
I first met Judge Silberman when I was clerking for Judge Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
CTB v NGN [2011] EWHC 1232, in which Eady J prevented publication of the name of Ryan Giggs as the premiership footballer who had been in a relationship with Imogen Thomas. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 8:19 am by Zak Gowen
  His first four antitrust opinions for the Court were in the defendants’ favor: Brown v. [read post]