Search for: "District of Columbia v. Heller"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
See Columbia Hous. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 1:41 pm
By the en banc majority's theory, lightly premised on a tendentious reading of the Supreme Court's District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:46 am
Supreme Court revisited the issue in the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:06 pm
Stevens, of course, had dissented in that case, and in the decision in 2008, in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:04 am
But what was not similarly clear in the hearing on District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:18 pm
In 2008, the Supreme Court issued the landmark Heller decision striking down the handgun ban of the District of Columbia, while stating that the core of the Second Amendment is the right to protect oneself with a gun inside one’s home. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:47 am
Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939). [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Wade (1973) (as later limited by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 1:23 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:57 pm
” Dowling v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm
For this reason, handguns are the most preferred guns for lawful defense—as Justice Antonin Scalia pointed out in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
The district court held that E.M.D. had failed to prove the exemption applied by “clear and convincing evidence,” and the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 12:20 pm
Park v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:50 pm
Here is the entirety of its Second Amendment analysis:Appellee [i.e., Stone] also urges this court to affirm the trial court’s dismissal based upon the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which, pursuant to District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 6:00 am
In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
Although conservatives and pro-gun organizations and individuals oppose this conclusion, legal historians, judges, and legal scholars have debated this specific question for over a century.Last year, the Supreme Court finally resolved this debate with its ruling in District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 11:38 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 12:19 pm
The Case: - Two-JD couple, solid credentials: Georgetown (cum laude) and NYU Law for her; Columbia and HLS (both magna) for him. - The groom is an associate at WilmerHale, where he worked on an amicus brief filed in Kennedy v. [read post]
