Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 881 - 900
of 173,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2015, 4:47 am
Yesterday, we posted the immigration law law professors amici curiae brief in Texas v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:16 am
Preempting Immigration Detainer Enforcement Under Arizona v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:08 pm
In State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:22 pm
In State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:45 pm
In the recent case, Heiting v. the United States, an appellate court denied a claim-of-right deduction in accordance with Section 1341 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
The United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:55 am
Timbrell v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 701; [2010] WLR (D) 155 The Gender Recognition Act 2004 did not have retrospective effect, and since the United Kingdom had failed to implement the relevant Community law Directive within the time permitted so far as concerned acquired gender and rights to pensions, an individual could invoke the Directive as its provisions were unconditional and precise. [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:18 am
Regina (BAPIO Action Ltd and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another House of Lords “Government guidance to National Health Service employers which had the effect of preventing overseas trainee doctors from being offered postgraduate training places in NHS hospitals was unlawful. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 1:58 am
Disparity reference to ECJ Regina (Horvath) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Court of Appeal “The Court of Appeal had jurisdiction to review a reference by the High Court to the Court of Justice of the European Communities but if unable with complete confidence to resolve the issue, should uphold the reference. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:22 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection and Another Court of Appeal “Information supplied by applicants for animal experiment licences was exempt from disclosure under freedom of information provisions if the official in possession of the information knew or had reasonable grounds for believing that it was given in confidence. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
Policy restricted powers Regina (NA (Iraq)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Others Court of Appeal “Instructions to entry clearance officers that S-series passports were no longer acceptable as evidence of identity and nationality amounted to an unlawful restriction on their powers to decide in individual cases whether such a passport met requirements. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:08 am
Abuse of executive power over Chagos Islanders Regina (Bancoult) v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 6:23 pm
Circuit Review – United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:11 am
Read the opinion The post ERIC GREENBERG v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 2:19 am
Gibson v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:54 am
Regina (Modhej and another) v Secretary of State for Justice: [2012] EWCA Civ 957; [2012] WLR (D) 210 “Where the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against sentence at a time by which, subsequent to the original passing of sentence, the law had changed in relation to release on licence, it was not the case that reliance could be placed on the particularities of such date in order to claim that it was the later provisions which governed… [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:03 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:38 am
Pape and its ruling that, where state action is present, section 1983’s color of law requirement is thereby met. [read post]
