Search for: "Law v. State" Results 881 - 900 of 157,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Texas Supreme Court unanimously rejected a challenge to the state’s abortion laws Friday. [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Dineen Gillespie (Creighton University), Brief of Amici Curiae Professors of Health Law and Policy in Support of Petitioner, Ruan v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 4:32 am by Immigration Prof
The Case Western Law Review has published a symposium on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision in Whren v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm by Anna Christensen
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:45 pm by Ettinger Law Firm
In the recent case, Heiting v. the United States, an appellate court denied a claim-of-right deduction in accordance with Section 1341 of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
Up until this case, that position had support in domestic law (see AL (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 42, [2008] 4 All ER 1127; R (Hooper) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 29, [2006] 1 All ER 487; and R (S) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [2004] UKHL 39, [2004] 4 All ER 193). [read post]
1 May 2008, 2:18 am
Regina (BAPIO Action Ltd and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another House of Lords “Government guidance to National Health Service employers which had the effect of preventing overseas trainee doctors from being offered postgraduate training places in NHS hospitals was unlawful. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:22 am
Policy restricted powers Regina (NA (Iraq)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Others Court of Appeal “Instructions to entry clearance officers that S-series passports were no longer acceptable as evidence of identity and nationality amounted to an unlawful restriction on their powers to decide in individual cases whether such a passport met requirements. [read post]