Search for: "Lord v. Lord" Results 881 - 900 of 5,883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am by Peter Groves
As neither of the third parties had dealt with the Secretary of State, the claim could only succeed if the court said that the dealing requirement did not form part of the ratio of OBG or departed from that case (which, incidentally, was one of three cases dealt with together by the House of Lords, one of the others being better-known to IP lawyers: Douglas v Hello!). [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 12:30 am by Dan Ernst
  Here is the abstract:As is well-known, the Court of King’s Bench in Marshall v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
On 20 July 2012 there will be an application in the case of Lord Ashcroft v Foley. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am by Anita Davies
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 1:46 pm
In giving the lead judgement in the Court of Appeal, Lord Justice Moore-Bick, quoted extensively from the judgment of Lord Justice Diplock in Tappenden v Artus (Tappenden v Artus [1964] 2 Q.B. 185). [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:18 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix Chambers
Gilham v Ministry of Justice , heard 5 June 2019 and 6 June 2019. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:10 am by James Hand
At the end of July, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Hounga v Allen [2014] UKSC 47. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:03 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Lord Ordinary, Lord Glennie, rejected the liquidator’s argument that the sale was a gratuitous alienation. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
There are two appeals in the Privy Council this week to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 2:09 am by Charon QC
See in particular the speech of Lord Porter in Bolton v Stone [1951] AC 850 at 858. “ HELD The appeal was dismissed. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 1:42 am by INFORRM
One aspect of this issue was covered in my post on the  case of Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 2:23 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Nwogbo & Paul Chukwudi Ezinna, Nigeria Ports and Arms Smuggling: Evaluation of Cargo Tracking Note Amidst Growing Insecurity V. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
XJA v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 3174 (QB) at [15]. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 12:41 am by Eloise Le Santo, Matrix
The Supreme Court, constituted of Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson will hear this case on 9th and 10th October 2013. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:15 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On the 9-10 February 2016 the case was heard by a panel of five – Lord Neuberger, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hodge. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:20 pm by Simon Gibbs
Moreover, the submission is contrary to the decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN (No. 2), which remains binding on this court. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
This devolution jurisdiction was first exercised by the Privy Council to rule on allegations of Convention rights violations by the prosecution in both solemn procedure (Montgomery v HMA 2001 SC (PC) 1, 19 October 2000) and summary criminal procedure (Brown v Stott 2001 SC (PC) 43, 5 December 2000). [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 1:24 pm by skelly
Locke Lord’s Privacy & Cybersecurity Newsletter provides topical snapshots of recent developments in the fast-changing world of privacy, data protection, and cyber risk management. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The trial judge held that he was bound to follow the approach adopted by the House of Lords in the cases of Cookson v Knowles [1979] AC 556 and Graham v Dodds [1983] 1 WLR 808 and to calculate the multiplier from the date of death. [read post]