Search for: "New v. Tolle"
Results 881 - 900
of 2,710
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2017, 12:06 pm
Call Toll Free 877-446-5294. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 2:03 pm
For almost thirty years, beginning with the United States Supreme Court decision in New York v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:23 pm
On April 19, 2017, in Humphreys v Trebilcock, 2017 ABCA 116 (“Humphreys“), the Alberta Court of Appeal set out six “essential” questions that an adjudicator must ask in order to apply Rule 4.31, the “chronic delay” rule. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 1:35 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run April 12, 2009. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 11:02 pm
Nixon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:07 pm
For example, in Squillante v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 11:18 am
For example, in Squillante v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 12:04 pm
., P.C. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 2:28 pm
Davis v. [read post]
A grant of summary judgment without more does not support a finding of bad faith by the losing party
26 Nov 2011, 10:11 am
Ferolito v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:14 am
Mehra v Morrison Cohen LLP 2020 NY Slip Op 33234(U) October 2, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 159868/2019 Judge: O. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
Thus, although plaintiff raised questions of fact as to the defense, she failed to conclusively establish that the continuous representation doctrine tolled the statute of limitations (see Red Zone LLC v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 27 NY3d at 1050; Town of Amherst v Weiss, 120 AD3d 1550, 1552-1553 [2014]; Deep v Boies, 53 AD3d at 952; Gravel v Cicola, 297 AD2d 620, 621 [2002]). [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 5:57 am
Sherman v Town of Chester, 2015 WL 1473430 (SDNY 3/31/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Retaliation [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Submitted by: Theodore Pollack, Senior Law Librarian, New York County Public Access Law Library. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:42 pm
In People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:52 am
And that, in a nutshell, is why we strongly oppose such tolling. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 1:00 am
In [*2]response, the plaintiff failed to present evidence establishing either that she commenced the action within the applicable three-year limitations period, or that the continuous representation toll applied in this case, since all of the documentary evidence in the record supports the conclusion that the legal representation had ended more than three years before this action was commenced, and there was no mutual understanding of a need for ongoing legal representation in the… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
., et al. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 10:00 am
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Philip V. [read post]
