Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice"
Results 881 - 900
of 1,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm
-Saudi citizen. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:04 pm
Department of Justice v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:43 am
In an accompanying footnote, the Circuit Court called attention to two Justice Department reports criticizing Yoo’s performance. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 7:19 am
” In the New York Times, Steven Greenhouse reports that labor unions have reacted to the Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
”This Term, the Roberts Court in an opinion by Justice Alito enlarged the ministerial exception in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:39 am
Zelman v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:59 am
The nasty little secret of policing's militarization is that taxpayers are subsidizing it through programs overseen by the Pentagon, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Justice Departme [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
This much was made clear by the case of Byrne v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
As the current Court term churns along and conferences and arguments are conducted and orders are issued, one case from last term--Madison County v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Chief Justice Strine dissented, excoriating Duke for its "business strategy … to run the company in a manner that purposely skirted, and in many ways consciously violated, important environmental laws" (City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:30 pm
Bobby Chesney flagged the Justice Department’s suit to revoke the citizenship of convicted al Qaeda operative Iyman Faris, a naturalized U.S. citizen. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:19 pm
The Supreme Court in Branzburg v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:39 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
Writing for the Court and joined by Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, Breyer, and Ginsburg, Justice Kennedy recognized that states have historically been allowed to define marriage--subject to Congressional restraints as in Loving v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 7:27 pm
Perryman et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 4:45 pm
The aim of that Article is to protect the citizen from unjustified interference with respect for his home per se. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:31 am
Over twenty years ago, in the case of Starr v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 8:17 pm
The system in Alberta was challenged on similar grounds in R. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm
As Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in a concurring opinion in Vieth v. [read post]
