Search for: "Tea v. State" Results 881 - 900 of 981
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Marginal income tax rates in the mid-1980s were 70 percent on so-called unearned income, plus a few more percent tacked on by the states. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:54 am by Mary A. Fischer
Gray County is economically devastated and the political viewpoints there would make people in the Tea Party blush. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 6:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
She's also been courting tea party groups and has pledged to overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:36 am by LindaMBeale
[Warning to readers--only peripherally about tax] In January of 2010 in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:11 am
 The author has been around the block a few times and knows how to state his positions and how to defend them. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 11:54 am
  My own students should sift these tea leaves with care and not assume there is some "trick" to answering my own questions.) [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 4:09 am by SHG
’” Braley, 832 F.2d at 1512 (quoting McCandless v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by SHG
  It's an attack on money itself, the Buckly v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:47 am by Frank Cranmer
John Picton, Modern Law Review: Lehtimäki v Cooper: Duty and Jurisdiction in Charity Law: on the UKSC judgment on the status of members of charitable companies. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
I am sure you are aware of the South African court ruling which states that every person counts, including prisoners, in the Universal suffrage. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:47 am by Colin Murray
In the 1950s Leo Strauss had criticised the degree to which public debate in the United States had descended into what he described as “reductio ad Hitlerum“, whereby opponents of a policy would liken it to a fascist policy or label its proponents Nazis to score political points (regardless of the distinctions between the policy and those pursued by the Nazis). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 This IMMI goes jointly to the Supreme Court for invalidating most of DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) in U.S. v. [read post]