Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 8981 - 9000 of 16,996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2016, 2:27 am by Andres
Similarly, you cannot copyright ideas (see Donoghue v Allied Newspapers), the result is that you cannot copyright the basic idea of a recipe, imagine that I invent a recipe for an anchovies and peanut butter sandwich, I cannot stop other people from creating their own recipes of that idea.This leaves a very limited scope for protection. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:11 am by Marie Louise
The People) (ArsTechnica) (Public Knowledge) (TorrentFreak) (1709 Blog) (Out-Law.com) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court Minnesota: Judge again reduces award to $2250 per infringed work in Capitol Records v Thomas-Rasset – RIAA appeals (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:33 am by Sam Bray
A mere statute cannot grant to the courts a power that lies beyond the “judicial Power. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 6:44 am by Amy Howe
Over forty years ago, it insists, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:51 am by Matt Bartus
Now let’s take a deeper dive into the issue of misclassifying people as employees vs. independent contractors. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:10 pm by Brett Trout
 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC that the Rosen-Durling test is out and the tried and true Graham v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 10:20 am by Lyle Denniston
In the other case in which the Court granted review on Monday, Jennings v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
These cases range from ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4 (an immigration case) and ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 439 through to PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 8:34 am by Hal Baker
The Third Division of the Colorado Court of Appeals recently interpreted the Homeowner Protection Act of 2007 (the “HPA”) in Heights Healthcare v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:18 pm
In an odd ruling on what the dissenting judge calls a "case about nothing," a 6th Circuit panel voted 2-1 in Morrison v. [read post]