Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 8981 - 9000
of 9,600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
In Cruz v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 10:05 am
Rand v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 5:32 pm
In Krenzke v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:55 am
This is an outlook that not even the Supreme Court intended in R. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:36 pm
Id.At this time, plaintiff (or more properly plaintiff's mother and presumably his doctor) had some direct communications with PTC that ultimately formed the basis of their lawsuit. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 10:43 am
Case Name: Decker v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:26 pm
Abdelmalek v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 9:02 pm
Duchinsky v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 9:28 pm
The New England Journal of Medicine has filed an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court arguing that lawsuits against drug companies benefit the medical practice by getting information about harmful effects of drugs into the hands of both doctors and the public.The case is Wyeth v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 11:24 pm
In a recent case handed down by the California Supreme Court entitled North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 9:54 pm
The United States Supreme Court is expected to hear the case of Wyeth v. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:03 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 10:22 am
The case is Wyeth v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:09 pm
Supreme Court ruling in the case of Employment Division v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 7:40 pm
Today in North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 6:32 pm
In their answer, the doctors who treated Benitez asserted that application of the public accommodations law to them would violate their right to free exercise of religion under the federal and state constitutions. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 4:55 am
If the state appeals to the Nevada Supreme Court, it'll be interesting to see whether the unprecedented $138 million emotional distress award holds up and, if so, whether any of the justices think that award is punishment enough so as to obviate the need for any punitive damages, or at least is sufficiently "substantial" within the meaning of State Farm v. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 7:58 pm
On August 13, 2008, the New Jersey Appellate Division posted to its website in the "unpublished decisions" section a ruling in the case of Darren Kwiatkowski v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 7:33 pm
In Richmond County Hospital Authority Operating University Hospital v. [read post]
