Search for: "State v. Word" Results 8981 - 9000 of 40,667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
  In his reference, the Judge trotted through the English court's and CJEU's case law Article 3(a) - Takeda, Farmitalia, Daiichi, Yeda, Medeva (and its progeny), Actavis v Sanofi, Eli Lilly v HGS, Actavis v Boehringer, - and found that it was clear that something more was required, but what that "something" was was not clear. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
In other words, the President’s counsel would argue that the Articles of Impeachment do not state offenses that warrant the removal of the President. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A word search for “professional malpractice” brought up this story. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
City of Chicago (2010), which applied the Second Amendment to the states. [read post]