Search for: "United States v. Close"
Results 8981 - 9000
of 14,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2018, 4:29 pm
United States, Romer v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 2:07 pm
United States of America. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 1:53 pm
From a motion filed today in Doe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm
ANTOINE SMITH, Appellant, v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:38 pm
As members of the American Law Institute ("ALI") we've been closely following the evolution of the Institute's Principles project on Aggregate Litigation ("PLAL") - read: class actions - ever since we joined. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:40 am
Gingles has been the centerpiece of vote dilution litigation in the United States. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 4:10 am
This is a fact that any sentencing system, not just the United States Sentencing Guidelines, would take into account. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 2:41 pm
Howell of the United States District Court for The District of Columbia issued an order, in CREW v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 10:08 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:24 am
So-called "symbolic speech" cases involve conduct through which the actor intends to convey a specific message and the audience reasonably understands the intended message.The concept is familiar to media law students, but apparently is lost on United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Judge Raymond Jackson, who last week ruled in Bland v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:30 am
In 1972, he received a jury verdict of $3.5 million, at that time the largest in the United States for a single injury. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 5:21 pm
Moreover, at least the national business groups, as represented by the United States Chamber of Commerce, have decided to put ideology over the interested of their members and take a hard line right-wing line. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:08 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 6:58 am
: "Sorry Joanie, I had to unfollow you" http://j.mp/pQtFS2 "Military Court Rules It's OK for Marine to Wear Uniform in Gay Porn" http://j.mp/pfKnfF this is good to see (but somewhat unexpected): "Military chaplains can perform same-sex marriages" http://j.mp/oS6rVX australia, canada, japan, morocco, new zealand, south korea, singapore & the united states have signed acta http://j.mp/r0dMhB #lwb486 surely he's too busy to play it… [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 6:49 am
As new symptoms arise, the fable taught that lawmakers (or regulators) are justified in revisiting the diagnosis, unfettered by judicial interference or constitutional constraint.In the Supreme Court's 1957 majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:13 am
My old friend Alejandro Manevich, now an attorney in Toronto, writes in with the following on today’s development in the extradition case of Abdullah Khadr: I thought your readers may be interested in this morning’s order by the Supreme Court of Canada denying leave to appeal in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 11:47 pm
The Supreme Court also described in strong terms the effect on the individual of such measures – “drastic”, “oppressive” and having the effect that “designated persons are effectively prisoners of the state. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 1:45 pm
Sentencing Guidelines are merely advisory, not mandatory, see United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm
This has resulted in a backlog of unresolved cases pending before the NLRB and in a case pending before the United States Supreme Court calling for the Supreme Court to decide whether the National Labor Relations Act permits the NLRB to act when there are only two sitting members of the NLRB, New Process Steel v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 3:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
