Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 9001 - 9020 of 9,064
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am by rbm3
Sharpe, c1998 HF1425 .M37 1998 See Catalog Apathy LOSING TWICE: HARMS OF INDIFFERENCE IN THE SUPREME COURT / EMILY M. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
Weinstein is troubled by the California Supreme Court decision in Nike; if we keep the definition of commercial speech limited, the viewpoint discrimination problem is minimized. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Moreover, I argue that this will happen even if the election results show a landslide against Trump and Republican senators, because they will have all the more reason to say that the results were rigged.Thus, if the election is close, Trump will say: “I could have accepted a clear loss, but this razor-thin margin is just too convenient, and it tells me that the Democrats in Michigan, Florida, and Arizona were up to no good. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Mary
This Act was upheld by the Supreme Court  in Eldred v Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003) at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/02pdf/01-618.pdf . [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The yearly maximum guaranteed benefit for a 65-year-old retiree under the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) insurance program will increase to almost $57,500 in 2013, up from $56,000 in 2012. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:19 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  That’s the message transmitted by a new Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuit against ValleyLife of Phoenix, Arizona. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 3:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  And on September 15, 2020, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit in the District of Arizona against Nikola. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Mary
This Act was upheld by the Supreme Court  in Eldred v Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003) at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/02pdf/01-618.pdf . [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 4:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
In a March 9, 2015 article entitled “Hedge Fund Manager’s Next Frontier: Lawsuits” (here), the Wall Street Journal described how the “next act” for EJF Capital LLC, a hedge fund run by Friedman, Billings, Ramsay Group’s former co-founder Emmanuel Friedman, will be to deploy a new litigation finance arm that has already, according to the Journal, “raised hundreds of millions of dollars” to “lend to law firms pursuing class-action injury lawsuits. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:05 am by Mary
This Act was upheld by the Supreme Court  in Eldred v Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186 (2003) at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/02pdf/01-618.pdf . [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by Mandelman
  California’s Supreme Court “pursuant to statute to protect the public and to promote respect and confidence in the legal profession” approves these rules, after being adopted by California State Bar’s Board of Governors. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
And consider the great length and complexity of the Supreme Court of Canada’s reasoning and decision in, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 6:05 am by Edgar Chen
Court convictions are not always necessary; merely admitting to the elements of certain crimes can render an applicant inadmissible or preclude a finding of good moral character. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Democratic Association of Secretaries of State is starting a tax-exempt organization called Value the Vote that will initially focus on five battleground states: Georgia, Arizona, North Carolina, Nevada, and Wisconsin. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
That study was cited by Justice Alito's opinion for the Court, at note 2. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 2:15 pm by Jennifer González
The Digital Resources Division at the Law Library has had years of experience with remote interns, so we were well-prepared for this pandemic situation and quarantine! [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm by Michael Grossman
If the Supreme Court takes a microscope to the Constitution and finds some way to apply its laws to impose harsh new rules against sex offenders, then so be it. [read post]
 Given the importance of the orders to notions of federalism and the proper spheres of federal and state regulation, any decision by a Court of Appeals may find its way to the Supreme Court. [read post]