Search for: "Bodie v Bodie" Results 9001 - 9020 of 21,354
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2010, 2:38 am by gmlevine
The goal is achieved through “a strong body of precedent” which “is strongly persuasive” even if not binding, Pantaloon Retail India Limited v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
The members of those bodies are not appointed by the government and there is nothing before the Court to suggest that, in some other way, the government exercises control over the University or the College. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Specifically, in another action, Susanna Mangione v Metropolitan Transit Authority Bus Company and Caesar Russo, pending in this Court under index number 20671/2009, and awaiting trial, the plaintiff claimed personal injuries to her back and shoulder - - the same body parts that plaintiff contends were injured by the accident in the case at bar. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:42 pm by richbailey
Supreme Court began hearing arguments Wednesday in Golan v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
One might have thought that the Court went out of its way to avoid finding that the primary purpose of the DNA collection at issue is “to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing,” (Indianapolis v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:55 am
Mandatory subjects of negotiationsCarmel PBA v PERB, 267 AD2d 858 The Carmel PBA case involves a “legal interpretation” made by the New York State Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:53 am
  The Appellate Division said that an administrative body’s act or omission is arbitrary if it "is without sound basis in reason and is generally taken without regard to the facts," citing Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist., 34 NY2d 222. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:24 am
Dismissed employee precluded from litigating her termination because of her failure to exhaust her administrative remediesMatter of Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health, 22 Misc 3d 1116(A)Yan Ping Xu, a New York City Research Scientist Level I, a position in the non-competitive class, was terminated from her position. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:04 pm
The judgment of the Supreme Court in Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:02 am
 In Neo v Anan Kasei([2019]EWCA Civ 1646) the Court of Appeal again considered the thorny issue of insufficiency, both the Kirin-Amgenand the Biogen kind. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:09 am
Watt had to determine whether the body was `viewable. [read post]