Search for: "California Law Review" Results 9001 - 9020 of 29,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2018, 3:40 pm by Anthony Gaughan
” The article is absolutely fascinating and you can find it here on the California Law Review website. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 3:00 pm by Amy Howe
A working group created to review the safeguards in place to protect law clerks and other employees concluded, Roberts reported, that “inappropriate workplace conduct is not pervasive within the Judiciary, but it is also not limited to a few isolated instances involving law clerks” and “frequently goes unreported. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 1:40 pm by Caleb Skeath and Brooke Kahn
  Following up on our global year-end review of major privacy and cybersecurity developments, we’ve summarized the major developments and trends observed with regards to state data breach notification laws over the past year. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 12:10 pm by Kevin
(As I mentioned recently on Twitter, in preparing the 2018 review, I came across the 2010 review in this post. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 9:54 am by Mitch Stoltz
This article is part of our Year in Review series. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Some senior academics speak out against required faculty diversity statements and pledges, at the University of California [Stephen Bainbridge, Nick Wolfinger, John McGinnis, Law and Liberty] and Harvard [Colleen Flaherty, Inside Higher Ed, Jeffrey Flier, Times Higher Education] Speech codes and “The Coddling of the American Mind”: Greg Lukianoff and Adam Goldstein guestblog at Volokh Conspiracy [series: first, second, third, fourth, fifth] “OCR’s use of… [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Hillel Y. Levin
Only a single legislature—California’s—has eliminated nonmedical exemptions; efforts in other states to follow California’s lead have been unsuccessful due to stiff opposition. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Lieberman, A Practical Companion to the Constitution (University of California Press, 1999): 344-45.NotesPlease see §11.2.3 Prior Restraints, especially pp. 918-929, in Erwin Chemerinsky, Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies (Aspen Law & Business, 2nd ed., 2002). [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Following the long-lasting dispute against Grenade Beverage, the California federal court awarded the cat’s owner the sum of $710,001 for the copyright and trade mark infringement. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 1:28 am by divi
The post New California Laws Impacting Civil Litigation appeared first on Focus Law LA. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:36 pm by Anthony Zaller
The post Hiring Practices Audit for 2019 appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:14 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a unanimous 33-page opinion authored by Justice Ming Chin and issued on December 24, 2018, the California Supreme Court addressed the standard of review for claims challenging the legal sufficiency of an EIR’s discussion of environmental impacts, and also CEQA’s rules regarding deferral and adequacy of mitigation measures. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 11:12 am by News
And like all other states, California laws saw some pretty big changes this year. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 10:08 am by Nassiri Law
California Anti-Age Discrimination Law A number of laws prevent discrimination in California workplaces. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 9:47 am by admin
Alan Rosca, of the Goldman Scarlato & Penny PC law firm, is investigating activity related to Robert Jamison’s alleged participation in private securities transactions. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 7:14 am by Nate Cardozo
This article is part of our Year in Review series. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 5:56 am by Richard Hunt
In the interest of full disclosure I consult from time to time with Usablenet on the law concerning website accessibility. ** The number of cases filed in state courts, primarily California is difficult to determine, but would add significantly to the total. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
District Court for the Northern District of California had blocked the rule from going into effect, finding that it conflicted with federal immigration law. [read post]