Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 9001 - 9020 of 13,860
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2012, 6:51 am by FHH Law
 But the NPRM does propose some limited relief for stations unhappy with their reassigned channels. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:52 am
The second is Case C-466/12 Svensson, a reference from the Svea hovrätt (the Svea court of appeal is one of the six appellate courts in the Swedish legal system) asking the CJEU to address the following questions: If anyone other than the holder of copyright in a certain work supplies a clickable link to the work on his website, does that constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC ...? [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 9:14 pm by David Smyth
  But I think it does tend to encourage these kinds of compliance-based cases, and the division’s leadership obviously wants to see them. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Again, the case at issue does not give rise to any discussion on insufficient payment, but on the interpretation of the opponents intent to pay. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:10 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
First, the enterprise must be “new” – i.e. formed after November 29, 1990. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 9:15 am by John S. Merculief II
Of course, the use in question does not have to transform the photo itself to be a transformative use. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
If Question 1 is answered in the negative: 2.1 Does a scheme establish 'fair compensation' for the purposes of Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC if the right specified in Question 1(a) applies only where recording media are marketed to natural persons who use the recording media to make reproductions for private purposes? [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 6:57 am
 The rest filed observations as follows:  * France & Italy: 7 cases each  * UK & Portugal: 5 cases each  * Czech Republic: 4 cases  * Germany: 3 cases   * Greece, Austria, Poland & Netherlands: 2 cases each  * Sweden, Denmark, Ireland, Slovenia, Spain & Finland: 1 case each Why so few Member State observations? [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:39 am by Gilles Cuniberti
  In addition to relaying on Article 32, Argentina also refers to the right of innocent passage and freedom of navigation (Articles 18(1)(b), 87(1)(a) and 90). [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm by Kirk Jenkins
– (1) Does the doctrine of subject matter waiver for the attorney-client privilege extend from litigation to business negotiations? [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am by Daniel E. Cummins
According to the court in Jones, the carrier's UIM rejection form included all of the language mandated by §1731(c), (c.1). [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 5:14 am by Daniel E. Cummins
According to the court in Jones, the carrier's UIM rejection form included all of the language mandated by §1731(c), (c.1). [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Otherwise, the solution remains non-technical and does not enter into the examination for an inventive step. [10.2] To the Board’s knowledge, the other BoAs also apply A 56 EPC 1973 in the light of A 52(1)(2)(3), i.e. the Comvik approach is shared by all Boards. [read post]