Search for: "M. B.1." Results 9001 - 9020 of 13,699
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
The arbitrators found in favor of Myer, and Americo filed aFN 1: Petitioners Americo Life, Inc., Americo Financial Life and Annuity Insurance Company, Great Southern Life Insurance Company, the Ohio State Life Insurance Company, and National Farmers’ Union Life Insurance Company are referred to as Americo. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
CODE § 37.006(b) (“In any proceeding that involves the validity of a municipal ordinance . . . the municipality must be made a party . . . . [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:44 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
Which means that the “action” referred to in Section 103(b)(1) has to be an action for copyright or trademark infringement, and the remedies provided under 103(b)(5) should be interpreted as applying to a subset of parties liable for copyright or trademark infringement, not defendants in some new freeform action for being “Internet sites dedicated to theft of U.S. property.” Even if I’m right, all of this is incredibly confusing the… [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:44 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
(B) an owner or operator of that Internet site. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
In art 36(1), an enforcement court is directed that “recognition or enforcement of an arbitral award… may be refused” only on proof one of the enumerated grounds. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am by Dianne Saxe
Canadian homeowners, residents, industry, regulators and appellate courts really do need certainty on the following key issues: (i) the threshold effect for liability m nuisance m the context of environmental or contamination; (ii) the requirements for a “non-natural” use ofland; (iii) whether environmental statutory regimes are a complete code of liability; and (iv) whether property devaluation should be a recognized claim in nuisance. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:19 am by SHG
Olson might be is a mystery) was sufficiently outraged by my response to leave this comment at Paul Caron's blog: Bobby B. is perfectly right about Scott Greenfield. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:22 am by Kevin LaCroix
 [1] What is the impact of a shareholder derivative action being commenced against a multinational firm simultaneously in the United States and abroad? [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:14 pm by Simon Lester
 The United States further considers that the EU subsidies listed above are inconsistent with Articles 3.1(a), 3.1(b), 5(c), 6.3(a), 6.3(b), and 6.3(c) of the SCM Agreement. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:07 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I'm no Romney fan, but on this issue I think Will, Krauthammer, and Adler are right that Gingrich is off his meds (as is so often the case). [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 11:12 am
A regra está prevista na alínea “b” do inciso IX do artigo 13 do Regimento Interno*. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:44 pm
During outbreaks of Salmonella infections, reactive arthritis incidences from 1% to 15% have been reported. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:08 am by Gustavo Arballo
Y pienso cuatro cosas más a propósito de ese párrafo. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:55 am by Dianne Saxe
Annex I Proposed amendments to Annex B to the Kyoto Protocol The following table shall replace the table in Annex B to the Protocol: Annex B 1 23456 Party Australiaa Austria Belarusc* Belgium Bulgaria* Croatia* Cypruse Czech Republic* Denmark Estonia* European Unionf, g Finland reference 108 92 b n/a 1990 92 b n/a 92 b n/a 95 d 1990 b n/a 92 b n/a 92 b n/a 92 b n/a 92 b n/a 92 b n/a… [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
1 Though I’m encouraged that opponents of the existing bills recognize the harm that online commercial piracy causes creators, I think the OPEN Act resembles too much the latter. [read post]