Search for: "Mark"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 151,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2022, 4:08 am
” Applicant maintained that its mark "is dominated by the design elements of the stately manor house, not by the improperly dissected, somewhat similar text elements of the mark and the cited mark[]. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 3:14 am
Would that mark be merely descriptive? [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 4:19 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark QUERCUS COFFEE for coffee [COFFEE disclaimed], finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark QUERCUS for wine. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 2:57 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark DATA ATOM for various computer services, finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark ATOMIC DATA, in standard character and design form, for overlapping computer services. [read post]
12 May 2015, 5:36 am
[Refusal to register the mark shown below left, for "Retail pharmacy services; retail store services featuring home medical equipment, vitamins, medications, and home health products for general consumer health needs," in view of the two registered marks: the mark shown below right for vitamins, and the mark PHARMCARE for "long term care pharmaceutical services, in the nature of institutional retail pharmacy services primarily marketed to nursing… [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:26 am
Cadbury first filed a UK trade mark application for the purple shade in 2004. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:53 am
- ed.].In re Miracle Tuesday sets forth the test under Section 2(e)(3):[a] mark is primarily geographically deceptively misdescriptive, and thus barred from registration, if: (1) the primary significance of the mark is a generally known geographic location”; (2) “the consuming public is likely to believe the place identified by the mark indicates the origin of the goods bearing the mark, when in fact the goods do not come from that place”; and… [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 2:46 am
[Section 2(d) refusal of the word+design mark shown below, for "automobile cleaning and car washing" in view of the registered mark GALAXY for "car wash services. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 3:21 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark BEACH HUGGY for "pillows," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark HUGGY PETS for "decorative pillowcases for children. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:58 am
Shachnow applied to register the mark WORLDBROWSER for an online travel information website for travel agents, but the USPTO refused registration, finding the mark merely descriptive of the services under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 3:12 am
" In short, the appearance of the mark is "relatively ordinary. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 5:01 am
" Moreover, said applicant, the mark is a double entendre. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 3:38 am
In short, "[b]oth marks suggest that the subject matter of a WINE(RY) DOGS book involves dogs that are symbolized by their connection to a winery." [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:18 am
The PTO refused registration of the mark LINKED SYSTEM for power tools and battery packs, finding the mark merely descriptive of the goods under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 9:00 am
" Applicant Calphalon asserted that the examining attorney had failed to enter its amendment of the mark to the special form "SharpIN" and instead improperly treated the mark as a standard character mark (although the examining attorney accepted the amendment to the drawing). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:19 am
Moreover, there was no evidence that the registered marks are even in use, and therefore applicant failed to establish either that DIRTY LAUNDRY has any well-established meaning that would render the cited mark weak, or that the mark is "in use in commerce on a commercial scale or that the public has become familiar with it. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 3:22 am
As to appearance, the marks are legally identical, since registrant's standard character mark could be displayed in the same font as the applied-for mark. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 3:45 am
According to Di-Namic, however, the proposed mark is "much more. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:37 am
TTABlogger comment: What if applicant applied to register the mark just for tea, with no mention of CBD? [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 3:21 am
In short, "[b]oth marks suggest that the subject matter of a WINE(RY) DOGS book involves dogs that are symbolized by their connection to a winery." [read post]
