Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 178,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 7:27 am
"[Plaintiff] ignores this Court’s extensive analysis and review of [plaintiffs] 'wholly inadequate' pre-suit investigation. . . . [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 2:53 pm
Carter, Jr. dismissed as redundant Barnesandnoble.com, LLC’s declaratory judgment counterclaims of non-infringement of the plaintiff’s copyrights. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:01 am
Va.) -- ruling that: (1) plaintiff’s claims regarding agency’s lack of timeliness were moot, plaintiff had no right to declaratory relief or attorney’s fees on those claims, and plaintiff failed to properly allege a “policy-or-practice” claim; (2) multiple components performed adequate searches for requested records related to inquiry by U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
The court ruled that the Plaintiff’s conduct in moving a burning item is relevant to the assumption of risk allegation. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 4:04 pm
ICE (S.D.N.Y) -- adopting in full magistrate judge’s report and recommendation that: (1) plaintiff was bound by agreement with government that was “so-ordered” by magistrate to narrow scope of litigation; (2) agency properly relied on Exemption 6 to withhold in full two witness statements regarding investigation into plaintiff’s allegations of unethical misconduct and mismanagement by agency employee; and (3) agency properly found that… [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
The court rejected the Plaintiff’s argument that the precise location of the Plaintiff’s heel at the time of the incident was a material issue in determining liability in this case. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 6:55 am
[Plaintiff] bears the burden of showing that [its expert's] testimony is reliable. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
.), the court granted a Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiff’s §1983 and other claims arising out of alleged injuries sustained when a car pursued by a police officer crashed into the Plaintiff’s building. [read post]
23 May 2019, 6:37 am
DOJ (D.D.C. ) -- ruling that: (1) plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to responses issued by DEA and FBI, notwithstanding those agencies’ offers to perform additional searches; (2) DEA performed adequate search for records pertaining to agency’s processing of plaintiff’s earlier FOIA request; (3) FBI properly relied on Exemption 7(E) to withhold search slips and case notes pertaining to its processing of… [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:30 am
The appellate court began its analysis by discussing the impact of Proposition 64 - passed by by California voters during the pendency of the appeal - on plaintiff’s UCL claims. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:47 am
., the North Carolina Court of Appeals upheld the Industrial Commission’s rejection of a compromise settlement agreement. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:30 am
Thus, the Majority concluded that “when [the] plaintiff’s conduct is viewed along with the coworker’s conduct, it cannot be said as a matter of law that [the] plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of the accident. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:11 am
The plaintiff later filed suit against MCD, MCD’s owner, and Domino’s, alleging violations of Title VII and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 9:36 am
” The appeals court explained that the defendant discharged their initial summary-judgment burden of showing that the accident was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s spinal issues. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 10:01 pm
The main reason for denying the motion was that, in the court’s view, as pleaded, plaintiff’s complaints were futile – they did not meet the standard for a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 4:05 am
Plaintiffs object to the University's policy that treats "caste" as a social and religious hierarchy created by the Hindu religion. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 9:10 am
The plaintiff claimed that because those appeals delayed the approval of the Home Depot development project by the planning and zoning commission until after the deadline agreed to for that purpose in the plaintiff's agreement with Home Depot, Home Depot abandoned the development project to the plaintiff's great financial loss. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 5:16 am
Plaintiff asserts that Quality Heating is currently located less than 30 miles from Plaintiff's location. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 6:59 pm
Plaintiffs do not identify any action they took differently based on Sanclemente’s questioning. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm
.), the court granted a Defendant’s Preliminary Objections against the Plaintiff’s Complaint on several grounds in a motor vehicle accident case. [read post]
