Search for: "Read v. United States" Results 9001 - 9020 of 30,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2016, 9:31 am by Nam Kim and Christine Ko
 Thus, the Federal Circuit upheld Jazz Photo and reaffirmed that patent exhaustion doctrine is territorial, such that “United States patent rights are not exhausted by products of foreign provenance. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:31 pm by Gregory Sephton
  The new law no longer requires an invalidating sale to be in the United States – now it can be anywhere. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The United States Supreme Court just decided a capital case about intellectual disability, formerly known as mental retardation. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
The conflict between state laws that allow limited marijuana use and the federal law that bars it, in theory, falls somewhere in the domain of the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, which reads in part that “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; …, shall be the supreme Law of the Land. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
  To construe “these four puzzling opinions that have few common aspects,” Tyree employed the analysis for such situations adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Marks v. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 7:20 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
With less than two months before the May 31 deadline for public companies to report to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the inclusion of conflict minerals in their products, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered a final judgment in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 5:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
If white supremacists march into our towns armed to the teeth and with the intent to harm people, they are not engaging in activity protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:27 pm by Josh Blackman
[Read each of the opinions in only 33 pages. ] The Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]