Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 9001 - 9020
of 23,641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2016, 9:59 am
In the Ninth Circuit, it is known as the “Sleekcraft” factors, after the influential trademark infringement case of AMF Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 7:57 am
” Id. at *10, citing Crandon v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
The decision in Ruhrgas AG v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 3:56 am
by Dennis Crouch Helsinn v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:36 pm
Citing Gentile v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 10:01 am
That other case, Samsung Electronics v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 7:58 am
Talen Energy Marketing and CPV Maryland, LLC v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 6:45 am
In applying the FLSA’s test for administrative employees, the court in Lutz v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:58 am
In FdG Logistics v. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:11 am
The case is Maherlo v Charlet (pdf, in Spanish). [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
But his expression of puzzlement in Hugunin v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm
We have seen such agreements raised before, for instance in London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB), Lambeth LBC v Thomas (1997) 30 HLR 89 and Rochdale MBC v Dixon [2011] EWCA Civ 1173. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 1:42 pm
Heard, had agreed to sell the business to Dr. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 1:42 pm
Heard, had agreed to sell the business to Dr. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 11:33 am
The Finnish company Viiniverla Oy produced its own cider spirit in the Finnish village of Verla and in 2001 began to sell it under the name “Verlados”. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:01 pm
Here’s a nice personal jurisdiction decision (TV Azteca v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:55 pm
For more on the original decision in Kolbe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 7:26 am
Romeo & Juliette Laser Hair Removal, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:42 am
Judge White dissented, finding triable issues on whether the plaintiffs’ primary duty included the exercise of discretion and independent judgment on matters of significance (Lutz v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:22 am
Hugunin v. [read post]
