Search for: "B. R."
Results 9021 - 9040
of 55,772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2018, 10:24 am
Complementarity b/t patents and TM in industries w/low turnover and need for differentiation b/c advertising spills over to similar products, like the pharma industry. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 7:20 am
Robert B. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:17 am
“Plaintiff, Sheryl Menkes (“Menkes”), a lawyer, sues her former attorneys, Ballard Spahr LLP (“Spahr”) and John B. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:22 am
In June 2012, Proposition B won approval by the City’s voters. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
B, (the “Act”), had expired.[1] [3] The appellants assert that the motion judge erred in his approach to discoverability, specifically, that he erred in finding that by 2009 the appellants had all the material facts they needed to start a claim against all of the defendants. [4] For the reasons that follow, I would allow the appeal. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:32 am
B. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 1:06 pm
” Section 30-14-402(2)(b)(i), MCA. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm
Finally, the FCC also clarified that Sections 253(b) and (c) of the Act provide limited exceptions to the prohibition on telecommunications deployment moratoria by state and local authorities. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 11:17 am
It does not apply to HK, Macao or Taiwan. b. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) will be conducting I-9 inspection, and (B) to follow-up any affected employee or authorized union rep – also within 72 hours of receiving any subsequent immigration enforcement agent’s notices – “of the obligations of the employer and the affected employee arising from the results of the inspection of I-9 . . . forms or other employment records” A Partial California Loss? [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) will be conducting I-9 inspection, and (B) to follow-up any affected employee or authorized union rep – also within 72 hours of receiving any subsequent immigration enforcement agent’s notices – “of the obligations of the employer and the affected employee arising from the results of the inspection of I-9 . . . forms or other employment records” A Partial California Loss? [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 7:04 am
As set forth in part in the DOJ Press Release:[B]lumberg admitted that clients placed orders to buy or sell securities with G-Trade Services LLC and ConvergEx Limited, subsidiaries of ConvergEx Group that offered global trading services to clients, which in turn routed orders to CGM Limited... [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am
In considering whether the movie appeals to the prurient interest, we consider not only vignettes L and Z, which clearly depicted, implied, or simulated hardcore sexual conduct, but also the fact that many scenes depicted, implied, or simulated sexual activity, masturbation, sexual excitement, nudity, extreme or bizarre violence, cruelty or brutality, sadomasochism, and bodily functions of elimination either by the visual on the screen or the sound accompanying the same, including vignettes… [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
Instead, the Supreme Court stated “that there is no meaningful distinction between the concept of risk hedging in Bilski and the concept of intermediated settlement at issue here” because “[b]oth are squarely within the realm of ‘abstract ideas’ as we have used that term. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 5:36 pm
Siggins, Presiding JusticeStuart R. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 2:24 pm
In issuing its July 26 Order, the SEC determined that BZX had “not met its burden under the [Securities Exchange of 1934] and the Commission’s Rules of Practice to demonstrate that its proposal is consistent with the requirements of the Exchange Section 6(b)(5), in particular the requirement that its rules be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 1:00 pm
Series C and Series B funding account for 35.87% and 8.93% of funding respectively. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
In this short blog, I investigate how litigation can be used as a tool of change and transformation by presenting a short case review of a recent Supreme Court judgment, R (Coll). [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 6:30 am
Fla. was entirely improper) or 28 U.S.C. 1404(b) (arguing that it would be more convenient to litigate in Idaho).Concerning the propriety of venue (28 U.S.C. 1391(b)), the Court quickly disposed of Klhip's challenge. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 5:19 am
BENSON KASOWITZ, ET AL Christopher R. [read post]
