Search for: "Mark"
Results 9021 - 9040
of 151,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2016, 3:13 am
Nor does the filing of applications for other marks suffice. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 5:51 am
A mark is used in commerce for goods when the mark is place on the goods, and the goods are sold or transported in United States commerce. [read post]
FOUNDATIONAL MEDICINE REVIEW Confusable With FOUNDATION MEDICINE for Medical Publications, Says TTAB
21 Sep 2020, 3:41 am
Moreover, even in Foundation's word-plus-design mark, shown above, the word FOUNDATION is dominant. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 2:58 am
Applicant pointed out that it owns ten existing registrations for marks containing the word ESSENTIALS for nutritional supplements. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:18 am
The first cited mark is owned by a different entity than the other two cited marks.] [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
If, however, the vintage mark is for a product that is no longer in existence, you may be free to use it, provided the mark has been abandoned. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:53 am
" Applicant argued that the first cited mark is used for a billiard blog rather than for the services identified in the registration, and as to the second mark there was no evidence that the mark is being used at all.]In re Bayco Products, Inc., Serial No. 87708217 (December 17, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Karen Kuhlke). [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:51 am
In addition, applicant's specimen of use failed to associate the mark with the services. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 4:45 am
and several other BEAST-FORMATIVE mark for apparel and accessories.] [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:02 am
” Finally, the Board pointed out once again that even if Zuma were the first and only usee of the proposed mark, the mark may still be shown to be merely descriptive of the identified goods. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 2:56 am
"Opposer’s AIRBNB is entitled to a broad scope of protection against confusingly similar marks, therefore increasing the likelihood of confusion with Applicants' mark. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:07 am
[E.g., $4 billion annually by the MPAA for its RATED R mark]. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
"As to the marks, Applicant argued that there are "numerous differences" between the marks that preclude a likelihood of confusion. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:36 am
Does any such use fall within the scope of either or both of:(a) Article 5(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Directive and Article 9(1)(a) of the CTM Regulation; and(b) (assuming that such use is detrimental to the distinctive character of the trade mark or takes unfair advantage of the repute of the trade mark) Article 5(2) of the Trade Marks Directive and Article 9(l)(c) of the CTM Regulation? [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 7:33 pm
It's not just the weak economy that's been making it difficult for Mark and others to find executive jobs. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 12:45 pm
Thanks Mark. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:36 pm
[www.supremecourtus.gov]No. 07A383 Title: Mark Dean Schwab, Applicant v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:13 pm
The mark has been used for over 30 years. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 8:05 am
Registration of a mark requires an application be completed and filed along with a drawing of the mark, specimens of the mark, and the appropriate fee. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 9:07 pm
What do you do if you have an issue with a Registered Australian Patent or Trade Marks Attorney? [read post]
