Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 9021 - 9040 of 41,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2019, 2:00 pm by Salma Mokbel
Additionally, the notice letter is supposed to provide information advising the individual or entity of their right to appeal their inclusion on the list.[7] V. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
LSI Corporation, No. 19-337 (state sovereign immunity against IPR challenge) Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am by Patricia Hughes
Section 12.1(1) of the HPA states, If a regulation under section 12 (2) (b) prescribes a title to be used exclusively by registrants of a college, a person other than a registrant of the college must not use the title, an abbreviation of the title or an equivalent of the title or abbreviation in another language (a) to describe the person’s work, (b) in association with or as part of another title describing the person’s work, or (c) in association with a… [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am by Phil Dixon
Further, these actions were reasonable under the factors in Brown v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:51 am by John Jascob
SEC (18-1566): Whether Dodd-Frank Act Section 929P(b)’s jurisdictional amendments conferred substantive extraterritorial reach upon Sections 10(b) and 17(a) in SEC enforcement actions and in federal criminal prosecutions.Liu v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:05 am by Liz Dunshee
” VC Slights cited the Delaware Supreme Court’s recent decision in Marchand v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:11 pm by Richard Hunt
Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over state versions of the ADA, meaning that plaintiffs in two of the hottest states for these lawsuits, California and New York, could keep filing under state law. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
  Kennedy’s swing vote resulted in a few liberal outcomes (notably on same-sex marriage), but Roberts defected from the conservative position only when it came to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which he famously voted to uphold in NFIB v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:30 am by Don Cruse
(No. 17-0464) State Taxes Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Court then used the factors from R. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Luton Borough Council v Altavon Luton Ltd & Ors (2019) EWHC 2415 (Admin) An appeal by way of case stated from a DJ’s decision at Luton Magistrates. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by Giles Peaker
That rate was clearly stated in the particulars of claim. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]