Search for: "In re Reader"
Results 9041 - 9060
of 29,723
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2016, 3:49 pm
United States District Court (In re United States), 791 F.3d 945 (9th Cir. 2015). [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 11:11 am
Once again, we're working alongside great partners in the copyright space to make sure that the public—from technology users, to readers, to fans, to artists—get their voice heard in debates that are all too often limited to a few industry lobbies. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:27 am
What do readers think will be the hot issues? [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 3:56 am
They’re being pushed, and pushed hard. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:53 am
Former Guest Kat Darren Meale, of Simmons & Simmons in London, has done some hard initial thinking on this and he shares his thoughts with Kat readers. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:11 pm
Depending when a particular reader views the thread, he may see some or all of the eventual total number of comments. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:48 am
We’re veering pretty far from my original post at this point. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:41 am
And not have a good time during his residence there.The Court of Appeal's factual recitation follows a predictable pattern, but there were a couple of surprising statements in there.For example, after the first paragraph quoted above, which introduces 10-year old Alexis to the reader, Justice Lavin's opinion states: "By 1986, defendant and Alexis had started dating. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
I mean, omnipotent legal research gods (and goddesses) law Librarians are, we're not mind readers. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 8:49 am
Highlighted below are quotes organized by topic that might be particularly relevant to Lawfare readers. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:57 am
The goal was to spark more global, intellectual, and frank reflection on how the pope’s environmental thinking could help us re-imagine how ecologies and theologies interrelate in the twenty-first century. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 4:08 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 8:02 am
So then should the rule be that even today, you’re a “natural born” citizen if you’re born in Canada with an American dad, but not if all you’ve got is an American mom? [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 4:49 am
You’re welcome, President Shapiro. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Every week we present the summary of a decision handed down by a Québec court provided to us by SOQUIJ and considered to be of interest to our readers throughout Canada. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 3:50 am
Can’t live with them but can’t deny they’re right. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:52 pm
They’re shocked when they learn it. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:52 pm
They’re shocked when they learn it. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
They’re for profit? [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 5:13 am
If this content is not in your news reader, it means the page you are viewing infringes copyright. [read post]
