Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 9041 - 9060
of 16,401
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
It is particularly strong because the First Circuit deferred not just to a state’s highest court, but deferred in an area where the state’s highest court had expressly reserved judgment. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 4:44 am
I’ve been thinking about the 1968 Supreme Court case of Hunter v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:54 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:20 am
In Under Seal v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:27 pm
The News Scan notes today's decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:21 am
One month and one week after the appellate opinion was handed down in the Oracle v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
In Nakkhumpun v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
In this connection, the Court stressed the strong privacy interest individuals have in maintaining the anonymity of their online activities. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:46 pm
In this connection, the Court stressed the strong privacy interest individuals have in maintaining the anonymity of their online activities. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
Here is the abstract:This Essay, prepared for a Notre Dame Law Review symposium on the catalysts of constitutional change during the twentieth century, takes as its focus the Warren Court’s landmark decision in Griswold v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:48 am
[Note: this post is a work in progress, and will be updated as I digest the decision.]This morning, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in R v Spencer, 2014 SCC 43.The case, on appeal from the Supreme Court of Canada, has finally provided some certainty regarding the expectation of privacy that all Canadians enjoy in their online activities. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:59 pm
A strong dissenting opinion was given by judges Villger, Zupančič and Lemmens, who disagreed with the majority’s entire application of the balancing criteria. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
My colleague, Nicole Vincent, is licensed to practice law in the state of North Carolina and is a strong advocate for policyholders. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:33 am
On June 6, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in US ex rel Foglia v Renal Ventures Mgmt, sided with the First, Fifth, and Ninth Circuits (and against the Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits), and held that the whistleblower in the declined qui tam before it need only allege the particular details of a scheme to submit false claims, along with reliable indicia that lead to a strong inference that claims were actually submitted. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 2:50 pm
See Sebelius v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 2:24 pm
A Queens Criminal Lawyer said when considering a motion based on ineffective counsel, a court must indulge a strong presumption that counsel's conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance and the defendant must overcome this presumption that, under the circumstances, counsel's strategy might be considered sound trial strategy. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:17 pm
By Tom Watts A California trial court judge decided in Vergara v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:35 am
Without strong crypto, the Snowden leaks may well have never happened. [read post]
