Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE" Results 9061 - 9080 of 30,501
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2018, 10:00 am by Eric Goldman
New Destiny Church * ‘Reaction’ Video Protected By Fair Use–Hosseinzadeh v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:14 am
  As the the Court themselves stated:"We are conscious that in so deciding we are arriving at a conclusion which is different from that of an experienced patent judge. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 7:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice was heard on 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by Steve Vladeck
Fair enough, but I take that as a friendly amendment, not a hostile one. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 1:19 pm
  The ticket's worth only $2, so you'd think that the amount in controversy requirement wouldn't be satisfied and we'd have to be in state court. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:49 am by Jessica Perry
In determining that 7-Eleven properly classified the franchisees as independent contractors, the court applied the three-prong test outlined by the California Supreme Court in Martinez v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
" [On copyright restrictions and fair use see further this IPKat post]To be (likely) continued ... [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Matthias Weller
In light of this, national courts of the EU have been asked to determine whether the parent company located in a Member State may serve as an ? [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 3:59 am
Freedom of expressionFinally, the Versailles court addressed the interplay between copyright protection and freedom of expression under the ECHR [it is worth recalling that the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which has rank of primary source of EU law, also mandates protection of both intellectual property as a fundamental right within the right to property (Article 17(2)) and freedom of expression (Article 11)].To this end, Klasen invoked the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)… [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:46 pm by Susan C. Morse
Instead, the majority looked to the interpretation of “a similarly worded criminal statute” in a 1995 obstruction-of-justice case, United States v. [read post]