Search for: "FIRST BENEFITS INC" Results 9061 - 9080 of 12,596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 11:40 am by jmacpher
Progressive, Inc. recognized that “First Amendment rights are not absolute,” and enjoined the press from publishing an article with technical details on constructing a hydrogen bomb. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:25 am by Conor McEvily
Sea-Land Services, Inc., the Court held that an employee is “newly awarded compensation” for purposes of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act when he first becomes disabled and thereby becomes statutorily entitled to benefits, no matter whether, or when, a compensation order issues on his behalf. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:46 pm by WIMS
By addressing the issues raised at today's hearing, we can help put our country back on the path to achieve these two goals and deliver real benefit to the American people. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:42 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
A Fellow in the American College of Employee Benefit Council, immediate past Chair of the American Bar Association (ABA) RPTE Employee Benefits & Other Compensation Group and current Co-Chair of its Welfare Benefit Committee, Vice-Chair of the ABA TIPS Employee Benefits Committee, a council member of the ABA Joint Committee on Employee Benefits, and past Chair of the ABA Health Law Section Managed Care & Insurance Interest Group, Ms. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:30 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The Alberta Court held that the 2007 decision of the Alberta Court of Appeal in Maple Raiders Inc. v Eagle Sheet Metal Inc. had decided the issue. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:37 am by Andrew Ramonas
Fechner, the first woman to be a co-chair of the practice, focuses on matters that include health care, intellectual property, tax and employee benefits issues. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Both sides appealed to the Appellate Division, First Department, which handed down its decision late last month. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 1:10 pm by Steve Bainbridge
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., becomes to maximize the value of the sale of the company for the benefit of its shareholders. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Michael Sirkin
Call it the “First-Period Solution” to the Last-Period Problem; this non-legal force is present in stock-for-stock deals and absent in cash mergers, and the First-Period Solution might obviate the need for Revlon scrutiny in stock-for-stock mergers.[13] Of course, the degree to which the proposed First Period Solution protects target stockholders is unkn [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:56 am by Stanley D. Baum
In analyzing the case, the First Circuit Court of Appeals (the "Court") said that, with respect to a plan administrator's decision, where an ERISA plan gives the administrator discretion to determine benefit eligibility or to construe the terms of the plan, and the plan administrator makes a benefit determination under the plan, a court will reverse the administrator's decision only when it is arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion. [read post]