Search for: "MRS v. State"
Results 9061 - 9080
of 21,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
In the Virginia case—titled Landini v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 11:39 am
., Simeon v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:55 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:04 am
V Sudish Pai, Mrs. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 7:31 am
Mr. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 9:54 pm
Or, as in State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:53 pm
Well, I can agree with Mr. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
On the same blog, IPKat team member Jeremy notes an extempore decision of Mr Justice Arnold on the difficult question of controlling uncapped costs in patent proceedings that are more easily afforded by one party than another, in Canon v Badger. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Carter v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 2:51 pm
The facts, from Pacheco v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:42 am
Teal Bay Alliances, LLC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:51 am
Robbie Kaplan, the Paul Weiss lawyer who won United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
According to the trial judge, Mrs Justice Asplin:* To decide whether there was effective market access for an imported product, it was necessary to define that market. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:18 pm
On 19 January 2015, the Constitutional Court of South Africa handed down judgment in the case of Democratic Alliance v African National Congress and Another ([2015] ZACC 1), a case concerning text text messages relating to President Jacob Zuma sent to over 1.5 million voters by the Democratic Alliance (DA) in the run up to the 2014 general elections. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
Mr. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:42 am
The brother stated that he had shared with Mr. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:37 am
However, two months later in State v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:12 am
One could be forgiven for missing the defense win in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:08 am
`Mr. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:43 pm
A different result may perhaps be reached for Art. 5(1), considering that it might apply in the absence of a direct contact and that the ECJ has stated that conditions incorporated in a security may be transferred along with the security when this is handed over (see e.g. [read post]
