Search for: "State v. Doctor"
Results 9061 - 9080
of 9,600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2021, 7:13 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in eBay, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 2:19 am
To the extent there's a saving grace, it's that even border searches must be reasonable, though up to now, the operative law treats computers like any other sealed container and considers a search of a laptop to be routine, per the 1985 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am
She is a Founding Trustee of the National Museum of the American Indian and is the first Native woman to receive an Honorary Doctorate of Humanities from the Institute of American Indian Arts. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 3:07 am
The Court has a post called McGill University Health Centre (Montreal General Hospital) v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
Summary judgment for the employer was reversed on the contract claim (Balding v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 2:36 am
The recent jury verdict in Menninger v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 3:24 pm
Prob C §16068; Salter v Lerner (2009) 176 CA4th 1184. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:29 am
Penal Courts have also convicted to jail sentences those accused for state corruption. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 12:32 pm
From today's decision in Corbishley v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:55 pm
” “[V]ariation in forecasting skill is roughly normally distributed, with means hovering not much above chance and slightly below case-specific extrapolation algorithms. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 8:37 am
” Schroer v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:45 am
That’s what allowed them to come up with probably the worst 4th Amendment decision of all time, Whren v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:25 am
” Those regs state that “needed to care for” encompasses both physical and psychological care, where, for example, “a family member is unable to care for his or her own basic medical, hygienic, or nutritional needs or safety, or is unable to transport himself or herself to the doctor, etc. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:41 am
House of Representatives v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 am
Section 3214, Modernization of the Public Health Service: The legislation creates a Ready Reserve Corps to ensure that there are enough doctors and nurses ready to respond to public health emergencies like COVID-19. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:36 pm
"] From Friday's decision in Doe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:06 am
The DOL revised these regulations in response to a challenge by the State of New York and a ruling by the District Court the Southern District of New York in that matter (See (New York v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:02 pm
” Indeed, at the beginning of the outbreak, both doctors and the central government supported the idea that COVID-19 was not as dangerous as it had been described, stating that everything was “under control. [read post]
