Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 9061 - 9080 of 9,094
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2006, 12:51 pm
The Supreme Court, in its decision last June in Hamdan v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:00 pm
District Court Schedules Tunney Act Hearing On November 30, 2006 at 2pm, the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 9:48 am
  So, in the 1983 action, the District Court holds that judicial estoppel prevents the defendant from bringing the excessive force case, and besides "Heck v. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Transit Admin., No. 06-1029, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 463 F.3d 50; 2006 U.S. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:24 am
[A]s noted by the district court, "the record is devoid of any evidence to show plaintiffs made any extra-judicial or judicial effort during the eleven (11) year-period to request from defendants the specific performance of the contract. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 2:07 pm
State, Court of Appeals No. 79A02-0603-CR-180 (Ind. [read post]
21 Sep 2006, 2:03 pm
Previously, Judge Fremr was a Judge of the Court of Appeal in Prague (Penal Section) since 1986, and a Judge of the District Court in Prague from 1983 to 1986. [read post]
19 Sep 2006, 7:59 am by Christopher S. Jones
First Horizon, issued yesterday, here.Nugget: “Shotgun pleadings wreck havoc on the judicial system. [read post]
7 Sep 2006, 6:05 am
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred the class action to the Northern District of Indiana, and plaintiff moved to remand the case to Pennsylvania state court under the “local controversy” or “home-state controversy” exceptions to federal court jurisdiction under CAFA. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 5:58 pm
" Indictment Against Jovic International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) Daily Journal Daily Case Minutes Judicial Calendar ICTR Newsletter (June/July 2006) Latest Decisions THE PROSECUTOR v. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 6:47 am
  A few more, about which I was poised to write when X's op ed piece appeared, were done by a couple of district court judges (i.e., federal trial court judges) who have let the government off the hook for its terrible conduct in rendering prisoners for torture, in torturing and killing them itself, in running Iraq incompetently, and in prosecuting persons who disclose or pass on classified information -- no matter how "unclassifiable" it in truth… [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 4:45 am
On the first point, it is well-settled that, "except in extraordinary circumstances, a federal court should not enjoin a pending state proceeding that is judicial in nature and involves important state interests," see JMM Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
It first stated that the taxing power of Congress extended to any "gain derived from capital, from labor, or from both combined", citing Eisner v. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 11:19 am
George Pataki of a fifth Republican to the New York State Court of Appeals (NY's highest court, which has a total of seven members) even though that required turning down a request by the one African-American on the Court, appointed by Mario Cuomo, for reappointment. [read post]
11 Aug 2006, 10:00 am
The district court subsequently dismissed the First Amended Complaint based on Eleventh Amendment immunity and lack of personal jurisdiction. [read post]