Search for: "State v. Force"
Results 9061 - 9080
of 32,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2019, 3:43 am
United States, the justices ruled 5-4 yesterday that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
A Response to Masterpiece Cakeshop In the case before the Supreme Court, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
A Response to Masterpiece Cakeshop In the case before the Supreme Court, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
Fund v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:49 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:49 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:52 am
The problem goes back nine years to Johnson v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:46 am
In some cases, internal limits have been read into the guarantee, making it easier for government to justify the infringement (see, for example, Withler v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:55 am
Justice Thomas wrote the opinion for the Court in Stokeling v United States, holding that a robbery offense that requires the defendant to overcome a victim's resistance is an offense that requires the use of "physical force," and can thus qualify as a "violent felony" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:24 am
We found out the precursor to the European answer to this question late last October.The case of Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany concerned military status reports drawn up for the German government on a weekly basis, which detail developments of deployed forces abroad. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:24 am
We found out the precursor to the European answer to this question late last October.The case of Funke Medien NRW GmbH v Federal Republic of Germany concerned military status reports drawn up for the German government on a weekly basis, which detail developments of deployed forces abroad. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
A federal district court’s recent ruling in Thomas v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 10:00 am
The first one—Naji v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
Lewis, which marks a gateway device to block prosecution of class actions in the judicial system and forces adjudication of claims on an individual, bi-lateral basis in arbitration. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:52 am
So the specter of Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 10:04 am
” Amaro v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 7:25 am
Koester v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 5:58 am
People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 3:39 pm
United States (1994); D.C. v. [read post]
