Search for: "State v. Washington" Results 9061 - 9080 of 17,086
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Jack Sharman
  Grand jury subpoenas, unlike trial subpoenas, may be served nationwide:  there are geographical limitations within the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
 The IP Finance weblog carries another cracking post from fellow Kat Neil, this time on how far we can realistically rely on forward patent citations, as well as a perspective offered by Mike Mireles on what was once the Washington Redskins but which he discreetly refers to as the Washington R_____s. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Kennedy with the decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
” Gary Gately reports for Talk Media News that “[a] conservative Washington law firm best known for scoring a narrow U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:17 pm by Steve Hall
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 2:18 pm by CJLF Staff
  Richard Weizel of Reuters reports that last August, in the case of Santiago v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
Reuters, The Guardian, Sky News, CNN, The Washington Post and BBC cover the protests. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 7:07 am by Derek T. Muller
Utah and Oregon privileged both in-state graduates and a good chunk of out-of-state graduates; Washington and Louisiana privileged essentially all ABA-accredited graduates. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:30 am by azatty
The band is well known in legal circles due to their battle with the United States Trademark Office with In Re Tam, which is now before the Supreme Court of the United States and known as Lee v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:57 am by Danielle Citron
Today, March 24, is the centennial of the date on which the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Ives v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:53 pm
Monday in Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates v. [read post]