Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 9061 - 9080
of 40,667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
In June, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in City of Ontario v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:39 am
Brill v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 5:39 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Keithly v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
* For factual background of this appeal see Blackman v Metropolitan Tr. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:05 pm
See Fractional School Dist No 9 in Waterford and Pontiac Twps, Oakland City v Beardslee, 248 Mich 112; 226 NW2d 867 (1929). [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
In the words of the Appellate Division, “as the arbitrator grounded his reasoning in the evidence, including an assessment of the employee as frank and apologetic,” the Department’s contention that termination is the only appropriate penalty “is without merit,” citing United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 v Board of Education, 1 NY3d 72. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
"The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_09018.htm_________________Click here to Read a FREE excerpt from A Reasonable Disciplinary Penalty Under the Circumstances imposed on officers and employees of New York State and its political subdivisions. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:00 am
The recent case of Claydon v Mzuri is a particularly harsh example of the application of the prior use case law. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 5:02 pm
Party v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 6:18 am
The case posing this question is Glaberson v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
* For factual background of this appeal see Blackman v Metropolitan Tr. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:11 pm
V, § 12(c)(1), Fla. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:11 pm
United States, letting stand a D.C. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:11 am
It does not.The case is Sanderson v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:38 am
Meade questions my word use in a previous post. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
" In the words of the Appellate Division, "The employment of a probationary employee may be terminated without a hearing and without a statement of reasons in the absence of a demonstration that the termination was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible or an illegal purpose, or in violation of statutory or decisional law. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:18 am
We call it "class of one" equal protection cases.The case is Beard v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:19 am
Seal of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 12:48 pm
Julien v. [read post]
