Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 9061 - 9080 of 23,704
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2009, 8:14 am by Steve Statsinger
Here they are:In United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
Smirnov stalked her to her workplace parking lot where he shot her 11-12 times with a .40-caliber handgun.... [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 6:24 am
  When the United States Supreme Court addressed this problem with regard to claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
The European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.6(1) applied in all its force, and it followed from the reasoning of the Strasbourg Court in A v United Kingdom (2009) 49 EHRR as interpreted by the House of Lords in Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74 that the Treasury was obliged to afford the claimant bank sufficient disclosure to enable it to give effective instructions about the essential allegations made against it. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:43 am
United States (2005) - felon firearm possession ban doesn't cover foreign convictions Tennessee v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 4:36 pm by Gregory Forman
 Windsor paid $363,053 in estate taxes that she would not otherwise have had to pay had the United States recognized her marriage. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 2:53 am by John L. Welch
Bereskin, Q.C., Anti-Dilution, Anti-Free-Riding Laws in the United States, Canada, and the EU: Bridges Too Far?. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Something similar has been happening to shareholder voting rights in the United States, though it has garnered much less attention. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Something similar has been happening to shareholder voting rights in the United States, though it has garnered much less attention. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
She went to the United Kingdom to look for employment. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am by Calvin Massey
United States, in which a plurality concluded that a fish is not a tangible object, at least for purposes of criminal liability under the Sarbanes-Oxley act? [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 1:40 pm by Ellen Marrus
The United States Supreme Court today continued with its line of cases favoring children in the decisions of Miller v. [read post]