Search for: "City of New York v. State of New York"
Results 9081 - 9100
of 10,061
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2009, 9:27 am
Town of Brookhaven - New York Court of Appeals (comprehensive taking plan) City of Stockton v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Div., 1st Dept., 251 A.D.2d 62, involved such a situation.John Martinez, a New York City probationary police officer, refused to answer question posed by a superior concerning his conduct while off-duty and outside his jurisdiction despite being given "use immunity" with respect his answers to the question.Individuals granted "use immunity" cannot have their answers to the questions used against them in a subsequent criminal proceeding. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:22 pm
New York State Restaurant Association v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 12:44 pm
In a brief memorandum opinion, the New York Court of Appeals (the state's highest court) today affirmed the Appellate Division's decision in Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 12:38 pm
The Court held that the statute was not preempted by federal law and did not violate the restaurants' freedom of speech.The decision in New York State Restaurant Ass'n v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:28 am
Below is the link to a copy of the opinion in New York State Restaurant Association v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
This was the point made by the court in Levine v New York City Transit Authority, 70 AD2d 900, affirmed 49 NY2d 747. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Only service of the petition and related papers an individual authorized by the agency head to accept service constitutes proper serviceMatter of Lowney v New York State Division of Human Rights, 2009 NY Slip Op 30270(U), February 4, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 108754/07, Judge: Walter B. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:54 am
We have offices in Manhattan and Long Island, handling cases in New York City, the Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens and surrounding areas. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:33 am
City of New York, it addressed what constitutes adequate notice of a sidewalk defect for purposes of what has become commonly known as the 'Pothole Law'; and in Matter of Rivera v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:49 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 6:14 am
Vt. 2007).24 See Id. at 353. 25 See New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Article 75 petition seeking to vacate a disciplinary arbitration award terminating a tenured teacher dismissed as untimelyMatter of Awaraka v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 2009 NY Slip Op 00682, Decided on February 3, 2009, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentJosephine Awaraka, a tenured teacher employed by the New York City Board of Education, was found guilty of eight specifications of misconduct in a hearing conducted pursuant… [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
Corp. of N.Y. v City of New York, 280 AD2d 374, 377). [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 9:29 pm
On appeal, the Second Department affirmed on a different ground, stating as follows: Here, the three individual defendants, who comprise three of the four members of the LLC's managing committee, approved the demand that each LLC member contribute $10,000 because of legal expenses incurred in defending the instant litigation and substantial fines imposed by the City of New York for boiler-related violations. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 5:53 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Dismissed employee precluded from litigating her termination because of her failure to exhaust her administrative remediesMatter of Yan Ping Xu v New York City Dept. of Health, 2009 NY Slip Op 50147(U), Decided on January 23, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County [Not officially published]Yan Ping Xu, a New York City Research Scientist Level I, a position in the non-competitive class, was terminated from her position. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
"The Circuit Court said "This language cannot be reasonably interpreted to explicitly state that benefits vested as soon as a worker became eligible for a pension or to retire" as the phrase "shall be provided" in the Plan refers to "retired employees," rather than to current employees who might retire in the future.There have been a number of cases addressing the continuation of health insurance coverage upon retirement decided by New… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 2:25 am
Ct. of Appeals of Tex., 740 N.W.2d at 218-20; In re New York City Asbestos Litig., 840 N.E.2d 115, 121 (N.Y. 2005); and Alcoa Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:46 pm
" What were their discussions with New York Attorney General Cuomo regarding? [read post]
