Search for: "State v. Word" Results 9081 - 9100 of 40,667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am by Florian Mueller
"That quote is also interesting with a view to the recently-filed Intel and Apple v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
In other words, the Court explicitly abstains from discussing the negative impact the production and dissemination of pornography may have on societal groups, such as children and women, and the reasons justifying respective restrictions on pornography at a legislative or policy level. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:17 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In other words, the more egregious the breach, the less important the harm caused by that breach will be. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 2:51 am by Eleanor Mitchell
R ((DN (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 7 October 2019 and 8 October 2019 . [read post]
27 Nov 2019, 2:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  The NPR story notes that Syed, who was 17 years old at the time of the murder, intends to litigate a Miller v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 6:41 pm by Norma Duenas
“the interception of a tax refund” under federal or state law. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:38 pm by Kent Scheidegger
See this story in the WSJ by Jess Bravin and Sadie Gurman.The slender reed on which this injunction rests is Congress's use of the word "manner" rather than "method" in adopting the way executions are carried out in states. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
In determining whether a search is "unreasonable," a court must adhere to the decisions of the United States Supreme Court articulating the meaning of that word in a similar case. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:26 am by Ronald Mann
In every practical way, the OCGA is the operative publication of Georgia’s legislation, every word of which (including the annotations) is unambiguously published as a matter of state law “by authority of the state. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:32 am by David Oscar Markus
The introduction to this per curiam opinion (clearly written by Judge Rosenbaum), United States v. [read post]