Search for: "United States and it's agents"
Results 9081 - 9100
of 11,807
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2011, 1:24 pm
The secret court warrants, under the authority of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, grant the government broad authority to secretly monitor the electronic communications of persons in the United States, generally for intelligence purposes only. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 25, 1935. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:35 am
He stated he spent at least 100 hours preparing for each one. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:35 am
He stated he spent at least 100 hours preparing for each one. [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:00 am
I recommend that the Treaty be transmitted to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:23 am
Ultimately, after the ACLU filed suit, Habeeb won an apology from the government stating: "[T]he United States of America acknowledges that, by not registering under NSEERS, you did nothing wrong [and] regrets the mistake. [read post]
5 May 2011, 2:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:49 pm
We’re not aware of this yet being done yet in the United States - by all means tell us if we're wrong - but a litigation hold order precluding plaintiff from deleting social media information was recently issued in Canada. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE III Requisitions for the surrender of fugitives from justice shall be made by the diplomatic agents of the contracting parties, or in the absence of these from the country or its seat of government, may be made by the superior consular officers. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 3 provides that surrender may be refused on the grounds that the person sought is a national of the requested State, but that each party’s Executive Authority–in the case of the United States, the Secretary of State–shall have the power to extradite its nationals, unless prohibited by its domestic legislation, if, in its discretion, it deems it appropriate to do so. [read post]
5 May 2011, 8:19 am
Attorneys fighting to stop the executions argue that states have been illegally importing sodium thiopental from overseas companies that do not have permission to sell the Schedule III drug in the United States. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:00 pm
In the event of the absence of such agents from the country or its seat of government, or where extradition is sought from territory included in the preceding paragraph other than the United States, requisition may be made by superior consular officers. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:41 am
The company operates 1,100 restaurants in the United States. [read post]
4 May 2011, 9:00 am
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on June 17, 1905. [read post]
4 May 2011, 7:52 am
Potential for Serious Health Risks The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recognized serious risks associated with narcotics use including respiratory depression, central nervous system depression, addiction and death. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:00 pm
For the purposes of the present Treaty the territory of the United States shall be deemed to be all territory wherever situated belonging to the United States, including its dependencies and all other territories under its exclusive administration or control. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:16 am
Appellant argues that collection of a sales tax on these vehicle transactions also violates the Commerce Clause, Art. 1, § 8, of the United States Constitution. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:00 am
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:28 am
Of course, that presumes the landlord has recourse to the courts – which he may not, because New York, in its wisdom, is now seeking to ban this sort of rental: But what could really crimp the practice is a state law scheduled to take effect next month that prohibits rentals of less than 30 days in most apartment buildings. [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:00 am
United States on the fact that the activities at issue in those cases were ones in which the executive had traditionally engaged. [read post]
