Search for: "Banks v. State" Results 9101 - 9120 of 15,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2012, 5:56 pm
Chief Judge Lamberth discusses the means of piercing sovereign immunity in a ruling on motions by banks holding state-owned funds where the banks seek to interplead third parties with claims to bank-held funds that partially involve OFAC-blocked EFT transfers. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 12:15 pm by Veronika Gaertner
Its general rule, Article 4 (1), points to the law of the state in which the damage occured, i.e. either the state of the investors’ home or that of their bank accounts. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:39 am by Roger Alford
According to the statute, such an asset is one that is: “(A) held in the United States for a foreign securities intermediary doing business in the United States, (B) a blocked asset [defined as those involving Peterson v. [read post]