Search for: "Driver v. State" Results 9101 - 9120 of 10,245
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State… [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:33 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The Tribunal also heard from witnesses who stated that the pay reduction was being implemented for all drivers. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:56 am by Stephen Bilkis
Article 52 was enacted for the benefit of innocent victims, not for the benefit of MVAIC, which is a creature of, and funded by, that enactment to close the gaps in the law and to relieve the financial burdens imposed upon victims of hit-and-run drivers. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:33 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The Tribunal also heard from witnesses who stated that the pay reduction was being implemented for all drivers. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
Hardeep Singh is a freelance journalist and was the defendant in His Holiness v Singh. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:03 am by Larry
United States, but similar to the last post, I am not going to review that decision in detail. [read post]