Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 9101 - 9120
of 13,535
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2012, 12:01 am
Those disappointed by the Supreme Court's decision in the ACA cases have searched for a silver lining in an otherwise devastating defeat: five justices would prohibit the Commerce power from reaching inaction, a Machiavellian CJ Roberts took the long view, that this is the Chief's Marbury v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am
The defendants are the people behind the Freedominion website. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:42 am
But the case that every first year law student encounters within days of starting their Torts class (unless taught by a pamphleteer) is Bird v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
He's not just saying it would be a good idea to amend the law so there are penalties for copyfraud — many people say that. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:05 am
The first line I saw on the SCOTUS blog stated the individual mandate was a tax, then the next line stated that the law would be upheld. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:13 am
Part 1, future clouded, and Part 2, the silver (haired) lining? [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am
Back in 2005, in Gonzalez v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:52 am
In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court has held the individual mandate provision of the Affordable Care Act to be constitutional (National Federation of Independent Business v Sebelius, June 28, 2012, Roberts, J). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:38 am
The US Supreme Court handed down its decision in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:44 pm
This month, in the Kimberlin v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
Chief Justice John Marshall wrote almost two hundred years ago in Gibbons v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 2:12 pm
That's certainly true at the Supreme Court.The case is United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Coito v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:01 pm
Earlier coverage of Miller v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:32 am
The damage to our jurisprudence is far greater than most people yet realize. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
The Supreme Court has held that the federal government can tax people for NOT buying something.From the syllabus: 3. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:53 am
After Bush v. [read post]
