Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 9101 - 9120 of 15,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2008, 2:26 pm
The IPKat hadn't forgotten the patent decision last week of the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) in Thorn Security Ltd v Siemens Schweiz AG [2008] EWCA Civ 1161 but there have been so many exciting distractions that he just hadn't got around to posting anything about it yet. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
Ted Sichelman, University of San Diego School of Law As Patently-O has described in several posts (here, here, here), the Supreme Court is poised to decide the fate of the patent exhaustion doctrine in Impression Products v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 6:31 pm by Ronald Mann
Unlike patents, which require a notable step of inventiveness, the level of expressive spark necessary for copyright protection is quite low. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 9:23 am
The child also had low levels of vitamin C, needed for blood coagulation. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:35 am by Giles Peaker
It recognises the reality of overcrowding and difficult renting conditions for the low paid in London, and the lack of other options, and dispatches the dubious idea that allowing your children to reach 10 years old was a ‘deliberate act’. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:14 am by Charlotte Garden
ShareAt Wednesday’s oral argument in Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 1:30 pm by Giles Peaker
Thomas v Lambeth LBC, County Court at Central London, 16 March 2017 This is a s.204 appeal in the County Court of a vulnerability decision by Lambeth. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm by Kashmir Hill
Last year, two Washington lawyers actually let me set them up on a V-Day date. [read post]